I've been playing chess since I was 5 years old,
5 year-olds can't understand chess yet. Who are you trying to kid?
Over the years, I, and everybody else you have fought with on these boards, have proven time and again that you are intellectually inferior.
You always say that, but there are many areas to be superior over someone in. We haven't even mentioned half of them in all these years. So your bold claim isunfair and vicious.
Besides, Chess is a game. To be good at chess you need two things: to know the rules of the game and to think two steps ahead. It doesn't take alot of brainpower, unless you're up against a chessmaster.
Here's where I already outbrain you on 2 points. You also have to know how each individual piece moves, and that's all separate from the rules. Also, it also takes an average person to to have muhc brainpower to play if they are playing an equal oppoent.
On top of all that, you yourself have proven that you socially/emotionally inferior to most people.
Another immature, bold claim. I've never had the chance to show one way or the other how equal I actualy am to others on these boards.
If I didn't know better I'd guess you were 14 by the way you carry yourself in your posts.
I could actually ssay the same about you. People of that age still throw tantrums like you did at Stoogeworld recently because you couldn't stand DeRita or his Stooge era getting the slightest bit of credit or praise. Those were small potatoes too! Further evidence that you think your opinion is superior to all others.
You came under this board under a new username, a board where everybody knows and hates you nonetheless;
The first half of that is true. The second half is a tired, bold claim that you and others have used time and time again, never taking into account the newbies, and in this case, even the semi-newbies that never heard of me. The other powers that be never exactly said they hated me. They must've overlooked this part of your post, or I'm sure you'd be in hot water for speaking for them.
and you pretended to be a new person who had just met me.
That's how you took it. I never exactly said I was a new person, and I never did anything to say or show that I never met you before, except maybe calling you "shemps#1".
You pretended it was your very first post at the site,
It was, as Viva.
and you pretended that you have lurked on this site for years without posting. That is the very definition of deception.
I have lurked witout posting at times, in the years since I first registered here.
What the fuck does Eddie Guerrero have to do with anything? You aren't making any sense.
You don't recognize a side mention when you read one? You obvioulsy retained all the promos and interviews of Eddie and other bilingual wrestlers and they came back to you when you thought up the ridiculous title to this thread.
While I am most certainly not "top dog", I am (along with Pils) "second in command".
You guys could've fooled me, the way you, Jim, call most of the shots around here lately, and Pilsner calls most of the rest.
I'm sure you'll do something insanely stupid and get yourself banned outright again. It's only a matter of time.
You have a funny wayof giving people a vote of confidence. It's also funny that you mention doing something insanely stupid. Check your board messages later tonight or tomorrow...
Negotiations? In order to negotiate you have something to bring to the table.
In in order to bring something to the table, the I have to know that the would-be negotiation partner is willing to negotiate. Besides, I do have something. Again, check your board messages later.
There's an example of that classic Islipp humor, with all the bite of a newborn child.
There's an example of that classic shemps#1 drivel, with all the relevence of a sperm sample in a blood bank.
Rob, thanks for your help, and I apologize to you and Pilsner for any grief "Viva" may have caused you.
Eric finally pushed me too far with his slanderous accusations - Rob